Displacement without record

20 February 2026 · 1 min read published
John van der Velden
John van der Velden
Independent Researcher

Summary

Thousands of residents lose their homes through mechanisms that leave no formal record. Renovations, temporary contracts plus informal pressure push people out. Without formal eviction there’s no legal protection.


Key Findings

  • Renovation-based displacement accounts for a big but unrecorded share of housing loss
  • Temporary contracts are used to circumvent tenant protection laws
  • Official statistics undercount displacement because they classify departures as voluntary

Context

European housing markets have adopted flexible contract structures. Governments present these as market-responsive. The mechanisms create conditions for displacement of lower-income residents.

Related entity: Housing Crisis


Evidence Base

  • City housing report 20241
  • Tenant interviews conducted under condition of anonymity2
  • Municipal data on renovation permits versus tenant turnover

Analysis

Formal eviction statistics differ from actual displacement. Policy built around recorded events can’t address unrecorded patterns.


  • /en/entities/housing-crisis

Internal References

  • /en/archive/

Methodological Notes

We conducted tenant interviews under anonymity agreements. The absence of official displacement tracking limits quantitative analysis.


  1. City housing report 2024 ↩︎

  2. Tenant interviews, March 2026 ↩︎

Sources

  1. City housing report 2024
  2. Tenant interviews
John van der Velden

John van der Velden

Independent Researcher · Open Brief Network

Independent researcher focused on institutional systems, accountability, and administrative processes. Background in network architecture, infrastructure integrity, and process optimisation.

Based in Croatia · Investigative Archive · Systems & Accountability
Full profile →